|
|
World Tourism Organization
Global Code of Ethics for Tourism
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction |
|
|
|
|
|
The World Tourism Leaders convened by the World Tourism
Organization at a meeting on the Social Impact of Tourism, in
Manila (Philippines) on 22 May 1997 committed themselves to
"work towards the formulation and eventual adoption of a Global
Code of Ethics for Tourism". This proposal appears in the draft
program of work of the Organization for the period 1998-1999. It
was based on the recommendation of the Quality Support Committee
made at its second meeting (Madrid, 28-29 October 1996) as a
follow-up to suggestions from various member States which took
part in. the work program survey. |
|
|
It is fundamental to recall that in 1985 (Sofia, sixth General
Assembly) WTO adopted the Tourism Bill of Rights and Tourist
Code which basically focuses on the responsibility of States
(including sections relating to "the populations constituting
the host communities") and the travelling individual. It is also
noteworthy that the political emphasis of this document was set
on the rights to rest and leisure and the freedom to travel
while also advocating, as a second priority, the desired humane
nature and content of tourism. Both domestic and international
tourism as well as its environmental and social aspects were
addressed |
|
|
The document was not legally binding and did not provide for a
follow-up mechanism. It is supposed, however, that it was used
by various governments and organizations and also inspired
certain laws, regulations and tourism policy documents. The
evidence is that on many occasions the WTO Secretariat had to
furnish the document on demand to tourism policy makers and
professional bodies as well as non-governmental organizations
and that there are numerous references to it in literature.
Nevertheless, its direct effective impact on tourism practices
may be considered as rather minor. |
|
|
It also inspired WTO itself to develop a series of technical
publications setting standards of environment protection, as
well as a few tourism policy documents such as the Recommended
Measures for Tourism Safety, Creating Tourism Opportunities for
Handicapped People in the Nineties (Buenos Aires, 1991), Health
Formalities and Information in International Travel (Bali,
1993), and the WTO Statement on the Prevention of Organized Sex
Tourism (Cairo, 1995). |
|
|
The latter document is an example of the new challenges that
tourism development and society have to face. And there are many
others That was seen especially in the environment area which
prompted many tourism organizations to draw up environmental
codes of conduct Other approaches were developed at both
national and international levels, such as attempts in 1990 to
adopt a Code for Tourists by the European Commission, and a
Model Municipal Tourism Policy by the then United States Travel
and Tourism Administration. In each instance it was insisted
that the resulting documents should be non-obligatory or for
illustrative purposes. |
|
|
More recent and current approaches aimed at corporate and
business community at the national level are developed by NGOs,
among others, in France by Groupe Developpment and in the United
Kingdom by Tourism Concern. In each case this work is carried
out at the request of the business community concerned. Both
groups have a approached WTO with a view to contribute to WTO
work in this area. This offer was also received from a coalition
of non-governmental organizations operating in Western Europe
called TEN which held a consultation in Madrid with the WTO
Management right after the World Tourism Leaders' Meeting in
Manila. |
|
|
These and other developments at various levels, including the
highest one such as the recent United Nations Conference on
Agenda 21 which WTO addressed suggest that once again WTO is
expected to take the lead and proceed to designing a firm,
overall Code for Tourism which would establish global ethics in
respect of the continuous and new challenges faced by tourism
development which is also global. There are expectations that
there should be a guiding and instrument authority for such
development. |
|
|
|
|
|
Content of the Global Code of Ethics for Tourism |
|
|
|
|
|
The new instrument will be able to balance the responsibilities
of all the social agents involved in tourism development:
-
-
States/Governments (including local administration
-
-
Private Enterprise
-
-
The Travelling individual
-
-
The Host Community
|
|
|
-
It can equally address the three inter-related aspects of
tourism development:
-
-
-
environmental
-
-
social
-
-
economic
The social aspect here is meant to cover tourism's accessability,
content and role for and in society, in particular its culture,
religion, ways of life, traditions and customs, and the
observance of human rights. |
|
|
|
|
|
Implementation
|
|
|
|
|
|
In contrast with past declarations the Global Code of Ethics for
Tourism is expected to allow for measuring its application.
Without pretending to be another international convention
demanding a legal machinery which traditionally tends to be
heavy and bureaucratic - and often not even promising effective
compliance, it could still have an ambition to make its
provisions obligatory to the extent possible, although not
legally binding. Leaving the new instrument without a measure to
check on its implementation quite possibly would lead to its
disregard and the failure to meet the existing expectations
about the Code authority and applicability. |
|
|
This can possibly be achieved or at least facilitated by
introducing two elements to the Code:
-
(a) appropriate language
-
(b) implementation mechanism
|
|
|
Before being formally passed by the WTO General Assembly, the
instrument should have been consulted and received wide
acceptance at the various levels, both public and operational.
The aim would be not to impose it, but adopt a code already
known and largely assumed by the principal agents and their
representatives. |
|
|
|
|
|
Language
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is necessary to depart from stereotyped, ceremonial and
mentor-like language which is characteristic of so many past
declarations. A combination of clear, measurable principles and
the ready-to-use check-lists to be applied to tourism projects
and developments could be an answer to this concern. |
|
|
When establishing principles and check-lists, their operational
meaning should be clearly defined to allow comprehension and
assessment by ordinary citizens concerned about tourism
development. In order to formulate principles, sometimes it may
be necessary to support them by identifiable research. !'his is
due to the fact that certain principles, although reflecting
popular beliefs may be not taken for granted and at times
questioned. |
|
|
Given an international vocation of the Code, it is also
important to use in it the terms and terminology to be
understood to various cultures. Special care should therefore be
given to its translation. |
|
|
|
|
|
Implementation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various simultaneous elements could be used to assist in the
Code application:
(a) receiving commitments to apply the Code by the bodies
concerned (governments, tourism industry organizations,
tourism investors, municipalities, etc.)
(b) establishing an independent body to receive and deal
with information on the application of the Code
(c) cooperation with NGOs in the field to monitor the
application of the Code
(d) recognition and prizes awarded by the Organization in
cooperation with other bodies for socially responsible
tourism project
(e) involving travellers, in particular through connsumer
organizations and tourism clubs, in the Code implementation
(f) introducing systematic reporting on the implementation
of the Code according to established criteria
|
|
|
Preparation of the Code by WTO
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 12th General Assembly of WTO could create a special
Committee . for the Preparation of the Code of Ethics for
Tourism. This Committee would be related to the Quality Support
Committee, a subsidiary, body of the Executive Council. The
Committee would establish its own terms of reference (including
timetable) and elect its president from among the personalities
who would like to assist the Secretariat in preparing the draft
Code. Those willing to voluntarily form part of the Committee
may wish to notify it to the Secretary General of WTO prior to
the General Assembly. At the Secretariat level, the work will be
coordinated by the Deputy Secretary-Generai. |
|
|
Following the General Assembly, the preparation of the Code
would regularly feature on the agenda of all Regional
Commissions and would be systematically reviewed by the Quality
Support Committee and the Executive Council. In addition to the
Special Committee members notified to the Secretary-general, the
Commissions may designate their own representatives to this
committee to ensure geographical balance. |
|
|
The preparation of the first draft could be entrusted to an
independent consultant who would take stock of the existing
instruments already adopted or being prepared by other bodies at
different levels. The consultant would take care of
substantiating the respective provisions of the Code by research
when necessary or would indicate where such research may be
needed. |
|
|
For reasons of economy and the need to use expertise where
available, WTO could benefit, whenever feasible from the various
meetings. organized by the Organizations or to which it is
invited, to consult the draft with the bodies concerned. Such
meetings could also be used to obtain acceptance of the
provisions in point and to consult the possibility of
commitments to apply the instrument by these bodies. |
|
|
|
|
Henryk Handszuh is Chief, Quality of Tourism Development. He is
involved in preparing during 1998-1999 a Global Code of Ethics
for Tourism for the World Tourism Organization, Madrid, Spain.
|